Thursday, 3 September 2015


Is it too much to ask, I mean really too much to ask, that I might sit down one day, open a newspaper, read it front to back (it's more hygienic that way), and say to myself, "toast my chestnuts on an open fire, that was a damn good, factual read".

As a newspaper editor, Lloyd Embley, editor of The Daily Mirror, has within his grasp, the opportunity to make a difference in the world. You would imagine that with such a role, his greatest ambition would be to expose child abuse, or oversee the exposure of man's inhumanity to man.

So, in his own words, what was Lloyd Embley's proudest moment of 2014?

"Firstly, the jaw-dropping exclusive Sunday Mirror interview with former boxing promoter Frank Maloney, revealing that he was now known as Kellie and was undergoing gender reassignment."

Week after week, we have seen Lloyd Embley and his ilk support Kate and Gerry McCann, with either old stories, twisted stories, stories from unattributable sources, or just unadulterated lies.

Take yesterday's article for instance; click here to read, as well as the usual twaddle The Daily Mirror touch upon Euclides Monteiro, a former employee of the Ocean Club where Madeleine stayed. The Mirror states that Monteiro's widow, Luisa Rodrigues:

"insisted he was an innocent man and has been fighting to get authorities to confirm they have now ruled him out as a suspect."

They go on to say that:
"Scotland Yard, tasked with investigating Madeleine’s disappearance after Madeleine’s family made a personal plea to David Cameron in 2011, have come to focus on the theory she was killed during a bungled burglary."

Once again, it would appear that Embley, perhaps whilst busy scouring the land for his defining moment of 2015, is blissfully unaware of the editors' code of practice:


i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and - where appropriate - an apology published. In cases involving the Commission, prominence should be agreed with the PCC in advance.

iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.

That's pretty straight forward. I wonder if Embley might take the time to explain how his oily rag continually breaches this code by printing, "totally inaccurate, misleading or distorted information" with regards to the case of missing Madeleine McCann. Most men carry their car keys and wallet in their pockets, seems to me a certain Clarence "cash for lies" Mitchell, carries Embley in his.

Firstly, Euclides Monteiro was ruled out of any involvement in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, not once, but twice. After his death in 2009, an autopsy was performed upon Monteiro, and his DNA taken, this DNA was cross referenced against that found in apartment 5a, and other crimes within the Algarve, that had no evidential connection to the disappearance of Madeleine, not only was that DNA proven to not match any recovered from 5a, it was also ruled out from any other crime. In short, Euclides Monteiro was an innocent man, something The Daily Mirror failed to mention.

Hardly surprising when you compare the efit of Scotland Yard's number one suspect, with that of Euclides Monteiro. (Monteiro is the one who doesn't look like Gerry McCann)

Of course theses facts don't stop the Daily Mirror from deliberately misleading the reader. At best Embley only cares about selling papers, and as long as the McCanns are ok, anybody else, including dead people, matter not.

Moving on swiftly to the second totally misleading piece of misinformation, and The Mirror's claim that Scotland Yard have come to focus on the theory that Madeleine was killed during a bungled burglary. That statement is complete conjecture, The Daily Mirror have no idea what the focus of the investigation is. Many leads are being followed up, so to claim that one is the focus over others is blatant misinformation. I have ask myself why The Mirror have chosen now to suggest Madeleine is dead. They've ignored the fact the dogs alerted to all things McCann for years, why say she was killed now? Kate and Gerry will not be pleased, still I'm sure you'll clear up that in your next thrilling episode of: "The Daily Mirror talks bollocks" won't you Embley, you fucking yes man.


  1. Nice one. So sick of the UK media over this case. Thank you.

  2. Most people know or they damn well should do by now, that anything spouted about this case is utter bollocks and has been since the McCann's first showed their ghastly mugs on our TV screens. It doesn't take much working out to know who is responsible for the child's disappearance, It just needs someone with a backbone to ask those that were there on the night in question...where IS the child? what explanation is there for her NOT being here? After all they keep telling us they know more than we do!! You bet they do, all the lot of them have a pact so David Payne informs us, why isn't he being questioned and bloody well made to answer what he meant by that? I'm hoping that very soon the world WILL know the truth!!

  3. But even those who seekthe truth are tricked. The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann website is dominated by the fraudulent Tony Bennett. He lies with more conviction than Clarence - and is getting more confident every day.

  4. And when we finally do know the truth will we also learn why the MSM and others who should know better, including our very own Scotland Yard were so determined that the truth should remain hidden? Other parties besides the McCanns seem to have a vested interest in this case remaining unsolved. I wonder why that is!

  5. When you read the MSM's reporting on this case it makes you realise that things in this country are not as they should be. The disappearance of Maddie McCann is only the tip of the iceberg. Because it's an human interest story many of us have followed it from day one and have been absolutely staggered by the MSM's reporting on it....................the lies, the lack of real questions, the cowardly bowing down to pressure . The whole sorry business that's considered 'news' these days. And this is my point: We notice the misinformation in the McCann case because a child is at the heart of it and that interest us all. What we don't notice and accept as fact is all the other rubbish spouted by the MSM. It's no longer an information outlet but a giant brainwashing , disinformation machine. Who is daft enough to believe a word any longer?

  6. And won't they all be running for cover when the shit hits the fan...if it ever does? They'd probably be begging to be taken into custody for their own safety.If Kate thinks there'll be ''riots on the streets if they are arrested'' she's living in cloud cuckoo land!! I don't know how some of those news reporters can keep a straight face knowing they've been given instructions to tell the public a pack of lies, after-all they must know the sinister goings on by now.They must discuss among themselves, or have their own opinions of what they think the cover up is all about, surely they can't all be that dim.

  7. They had lots in common that much I'm almost certain of!!!

  8. I have a few friends who probably only read the Mail and Mirror. I've told them about the case in the most simple terms for the last three years and at the end of the last conversation my friend said 'I don't think they'll find her after all this time.' She is firmly convinced Maddie is alive and every time there's a new suspect fielded by the media, she swallows the story whole.

    Is this partly because it became a sort of reality soap and the public do not want to lose it because it activates a region of their brains which gives them an emotional boost? In other words, it makes them feel alive.