Metagrabolized Muppet, Motson, Makes Mess of McCann Matters.

For those of you who follow our blog, you may remember the piece we wrote that totally ridiculed and exposed the lies and smears of Nigel Nessling. That blog is available to Goncalo Amaral, should he decide to take action against the organised team of 'pro McCanns' who, in a desperate attempt to paint Kate and Gerry in a saintly glow, have actively sought to defame, and libel Snr. Amaral. For those who didn't read it, or would like a reminder, CLICK HERE Today's prevaricator is the lesser known Ste Motson. For those of you who don't know Stephen, or 'Ace Ventura' to give him a more suitable name, he enjoys nothing more than taking the moral high ground; tricky if you're standing on a bank of blancmange. You see Ace, is another Amaral hater, a conspiraloon, and, whilst not tracking down missing cats...a bit of a dick. Enough of the pleasantries though, let's get down to business... To avoid confusion, I've put the quotes from Ace Ventura's blog in a lovely shade of fuscia. I think it suits his rufty-tufty persona. Ironically titled “A Tale of True Blunders”, Ace wastes no time in blundering his way into a paragraph littered with lies "Amaral’s investigation: Amaral walks into the apartment where the child went missing. He assumes that the child has simply wandered off – big mistake. He fails to put out the necessary alerts. He doesn’t interview the parents, or the last person to have seen the child, under suspicion and makes no effort at all to eliminate them. He is so ill-prepared for the investigation that he has to borrow a piece of paper to scribble down some notes. He does not seal the potential crime scene for future forensic testing, in fact he does the exact opposite and lets people and dogs wander aimlessly in and out of the apartment making it extremely difficult for any future forensic tests to extract any useful or useable information. He doesn’t even notice that at least one of the forensic professionals dusting for prints wasn’t even wearing gloves! Da Sousa (Amaral’s boss) later remarked that, “the crime scene was totally compromised from the very beginning.” Of course, all of the above is a big fat lie. As explained previously, Goncalo Amaral was the operational coordinator of the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. For the avoidance of doubt, let's break that down: Operational: of or relating to the operation of a business or machine, (in this case the machine being the PJ) Coordinator: someone whose job it is to make different groups work together in an organized way to achieve something. That being said, quite why 'Ace' is implying Snr. Amaral was the first on the scene, or was under the illusion "the child (classic pro McCann terminology, one has to wonder why these people struggle to use Madeleine's name), has simply wandered off". Snr. Amaral did not think Madeleine had simply wandered off, nor did the first officers on the scene. Taken from The Truth of The Lie chapter 3: "We need information about the parents and their friends, to know who they are, what they do, if they have problems in their country, if the children were victims of abuse, if the family, neighbours, friends could have noticed any suspicious behaviour, what are their jobs, if they work full-time, etc. Is any member of their family depressed or suffered from depression in the past? Do the couple maintain good relationships? Are they implicated in serious litigation? Do they have enemies? For what reason? So, I telephone Glen Powers, the English liaison officer in Portugal, inform him of events and request that he relay our requests for reports. We consider these to be of the greatest importance and await sensitive responses to guide our investigation." The above quote relates to Goncalo Amaral's actions before he even set off for Praia da Luz, and is fully backed up in the files. So right there, we can see Ace is lying. Goncalo hadn't, at that point, walked into the apartment, and he hadn't suspected that 'the child had simply wandered off' Whilst we're on the subject: "On reading this report, which was given to me on the morning of May 4th, I understand that there is no evidence sufficiently convincing to tip the investigation in one direction rather than another. There are many possible leads: voluntary disappearance - the child could have wakened and not seeing her parents, gone off to look for them; accidental death and concealing of a body; physical abuse causing death; murder by negligence or premeditated; an act of vengeance; taken hostage followed by a ransom demand; abducted by a paedophile; kidnap or murder committed by a burglar." Moving onto the second part of Ace's quote: "He fails to put out the necessary alerts." The police at Faro airport had already been informed before Snr Amaral was even alerted to Madeleine's disappearance. A control post had been set up on the Guadiana bridge, connecting Portugal and Spain, all police in Portugal had been informed as well as Interpol. CCTV had been requested from the two main motorways in the area. Spanish customs at two ports with links to Morocco, Tarifa and Algeciras were also alerted. Contact was made with all marinas, and video recordings, the Municipal Aerodrome Portimao, as well as registers of all boats leaving and entering within the last few days were requested. Of course, due to the fact 'Ace' has gleaned all his information from ancient pro McCann scriptures, I will point him in the direction of the true facts: Click here to read PJ files records of boat movements. Click here to read PJ files re Municipal Aerodrome Portimao Click here to read PJ files documents and maritime police. Onto the third part of Mr Ventura's claims now: "He doesn’t interview the parents, or the last person to have seen the child, under suspicion and makes no effort at all to eliminate them." Ace claims to have resourced his information from the ACPO guidlines. Quite why he would expect a Portuguese cop to follow guidelines from Great Britain, is a mystery, but we will indulge our pet finding expert for now. The ACPO guidelines don't state that parents should be immediately interviewed as suspects. Could you imagine the uproar if every parent whose child had disappeared were interviewed as suspects before the basic facts of the case were understood? Both the parents were questioned upon arrival of the police, and again the following morning, as well as later in the investigation. I'm not going to put links to each interview here, they can all be read under the heading Gerry, Kate and Madeleine McCann, on the following link: http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TRANSLATIONS.htm Perhaps Ace collars every owner of a missing animal, aims a spotlight into the face of the distraught owner, exhales the smoke from his cigarette along the beam of the light, and in a strong German accent, parodying such films as 'Lives Of A Bengal Lancer', shrieks: "Ve haff vayz off making you tok" An entertaining thought. "He does not seal the potential crime scene for future forensic testing, in fact he does the exact opposite and lets people and dogs wander aimlessly in and out of the apartment making it extremely difficult for any future forensic tests to extract any useful or useable information. He doesn’t even notice that at least one of the forensic professionals dusting for prints wasn’t even wearing gloves! Da Sousa (Amaral’s boss) later remarked that, “the crime scene was totally compromised from the very beginning.” I have to ask myself if 'Ace' is after the vacancy left by Clarence Mitchell - his words have been spun like a love-struck teenager's head. The crime scene had already been compromised prior to the police arriving, something Snr. Amaral considered could have been a deliberate act by the parents. As for the reference, Ace makes to Olegário de Sousa, firstly, he was the Chief Inspector of the PJ, not 'Amaral's boss'. Secondly, regarding Snr. de Sousa's claims the crime scene was totally compromised, our Ace drops a massive clanger. Snr. De Sousa was referring to the McCanns, the friends, and Ocean club employees - before the police arrived. As confirmed here: Crime scene compromised before police arrival. Sorry, Ace. That's the way the cookie crumbles. Once the PJ arrived however, the parents were removed from the apartment, and forensic testing began. http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/5A_FORENSIC_4_5_7.htm As for the above lie that Snr. Amaral doesn't notice one of the forensic team weren't wearing gloves, this was in relation to one of the team dusting for prints on the outside of the window, and it was noticed, as detailed below: "Inside the apartment, police forensic specialists proceed to lift finger and palm prints, a job that is preferably carried out during daylight hours. Others look for traces of blood, samples of fibres and hair. We notice with dismay that one of the technicians, who is working on the outside of the McCann children's bedroom window is not using the regulation suit, thus risking contaminating possible clues. These images of negligence start to circulate world-wide; this isn't, however, the usual behaviour of judiciary police technicians." I haven't forgotten about Ace's claims of "dogs wandering aimlessly" around 5a. I can only suggest that he contacts police dog teams worldwide and requests all dogs work a safe distance from crime scenes...possibly even from home. Moving on to Ace's next paragraph, and immediately we're slapped in the face with more lies: "The contact details of all of the people in the immediate area were never taken and to this day there is still around 700 people, all potential witnesses, who have never been questioned." Oh Ace, you knitter of nonsense.   From the police files, it's clear to see they were. Between the 5th of May and the 9th of May, 143 statements were taken from hotel staff. Additionally staff on duty that night were spoken to informally at the time for any relevant information. To contact and arrange to interview 143 people is a mammoth task for any police force, and it was done in just 5 days. Additionally, 27 residents were interviewed at various times as necessary. http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MW_STAFF.htm The UK police interviewed holidaymakers who had returned home, 500 questionnaires were sent out and returned. "Some years later, other potential witnesses, who were in the area but had not been spoken to at the time by the PJ (the Portuguese Police), approached the UK police to say that the PJ had refused to speak with them because they did not speak Portuguese!" Newspaper talk again Ace? I guess you have a lot of time to read The Sun whilst you're staking out a tree, trying to entice moggy down with a packet of Dreamies. As the files prove, the PJ spoke to many English speaking witnesses; to suggest otherwise just proves your agenda and your flawed researching skills. Next Ace waffles on about why CCTV wasn't checked, well it was: CCTV was monitored on the motorways running to and from Praia da Luz, it was from one of those cameras, that a possible sighting was noted. From The Truth of The Lie, Chapter Three. "Madeleine's parents are already back in Vila da Luz when we receive photos taken in a service area of the motorway: you can make out the figure of a little girl, who looks like Madeleine, accompanied by a couple. These images come from a CCTV camera on the motorway linking Lagos to the Spanish border. The McCanns are asked to come to Portimão in order to proceed to an identification. It's the end of the day. Kate Healy seems annoyed at coming back and made uncomfortable by the speed of the police car taking her. We are somewhat astonished by her reaction, as if she was not expecting to get her daughter back. The identification turns out negative." The Ocean Club itself didn't have CCTV, as confirmed by Silvia Maria Correia Ramos Batista, and Vitor Manuel dos Santos, in the PJ files. PDL is a quiet, resort, it isn't Beijing. Portuguese law states that it is not permitted to have CCTV filming its citizens in public spaces. such as streets, beaches, etc. Private business are however allowed to do so if they wish. https://www.cnpd.pt/bin/legis/nacional/LEI_9_2012.pdf Ace muses further as to why the CCTV wasn't checked : "...a nearby hotel had wiped their CCTV tape by the time Portuguese detectives had finally decided to ask questions there. The hotel owner confirmed that the camera would have caught the infamous ‘Smith’ sighting (a man witnessed carrying a small girl in his arms just minutes after Madeleine went missing)." Given that the Smith family didn't contact the PJ until twenty-one days after Madeleine's disappearance, they couldn't have known that there had been a sighting at that particular place. Nevertheless, Snr. Amaral did hold regrets over the failure to gain the CCTV footage from that evening: “I asked my officers to gather all the CCTV footage in Luz but, by the time they got to this hotel, the film from this camera had been wiped over." "It was a mistake and I will always regret it." In fairness, the coordinator of the case was being particularly hard on himself. Independent investigations suggest, that in accordance with Portuguese law the CCTV in question wasn't pointing at the street; it was in fact only covering the grounds of Estrela da Luz. https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/madeleine-estrela-da-luz-cctv/ I could go into the fact that Kate and Gerry McCann withheld the efit of this sighting for 5 long years, and that they stopped their team of private investigators from following up on the lead. It wasn't until Crimewatch in 2013, that Scotland Yard announced that the man Mr Smith was up to 80% sure was Gerry McCann, was now the main focus of their investigation, but time is getting on, and Mr Ventura has taken up enough of my time already. Next blunder from Ace, and here he tells us that: "...the Portuguese press printed a story, from a source within the PJ (I wonder who that could have been) stating that the blood they had found in the apartment was Madeleine’s blood (even though the forensics had identified the blood as male!)" Now I have two issues with this claim, the first being Ace's clear attempt to lay the blame for leaks to the press firmly at the feet of Goncalo Amaral. Leaks did have a pivotal and prejudicial impact on the case. The McCanns through various friends/employees have enjoyed a long, and beneficial relationship with the press. Clarence Mitchell, "a friend close to the McCanns", "a source close to the McCanns", Philomena McCann, Justine McGuinness, Lori Campbell... The McCanns have had many, many leaks attributed to them over the years, and not just to the Portuguese press. Clarence Mitchell spoke to press agencies worldwide: Mitchell's interference drew the following comment from Portuguese police union chief Carlos Anjos: "Mr Mitchell wants to discredit the Policia Judiciaria and invent excuses so the McCanns do not come to Portugal to participate in the reconstruction of the night she disappeared." "He lies with as many teeth as he has in his mouth. "Finally we know what side truth is on." "While the Policia Judiciaria were fulfilling their duty of investigating what happened to Madeleine, her parents' spokesman was manipulating public opinion." That comment was a true then, as it is today. My second issue with Ace's claim of the only blood being found in 5a was male, is this: He's a liar. There were several samples taken from 5a. These samples were taken as a result of Keela's alerts. The FSS couldn't confirm these samples were blood due to the testing methods they used, however, they also couldn't confirm who the other samples belonged to, nor if they were male or female. I cover possible reasons for this in my blog Forensic Science Service Closes, Leaving a Legacy of Mass Failures. Taken from http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm "However, all of the confirmed DNA components within this result (swab 3a),match the corresponding components in the DNA profile of Madeline McCann." As we know, sample 3a was a swab taken from behind the sofa. The area that both Eddie and Keela alerted to. The rest of Ace's blog highlights his lack of understanding of how Eddie and Keela work. Our very own Syn0nymph already drew attention to Motty's miserable attempts to discredit Eddie and Keela, and in particular his uneducated mutterings of nonsense, so I won't go over those again. All the apologists' excuses are roundly debunked here: http://laidbareblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/the-truth-of-dogs-mccann-case-and-more.html Finally, I'd like to share one of Ace's rather ironic passages: "Believe it or not, despite all of this, there are some gullible people, who have neither looked at the evidence objectively, or with any degree of impartially, nor who have sufficient knowledge of how an investigation such as this should have been carried out." All talk, no trousers, Ace. Whatever you're tipple, I suggest you take more water with it. In your case the saying "don't give up your day job", is something no man should ever say to you. I only hope there aren't many missing pets relying on you to find them; you couldn't find your own nose in the dark. etc. etc. "Alllll-righty then"