Exposing Textusa...Again
The majority of people who follow this case online are only too aware that textusa is a raving mad megalomaniac who cannot admit when they're wrong. Many moons ago textusa dreamed up a theory, one they refuse to show any evidence for, and when challenged, refuses to admit to any mistakes.
Instead of admitting fault, the barmy blogger will argue the toss, ask questions then refuse to publish the answers thus digging themselves into holes as they go. If all else fails, they'll attempt to frame you as a pro.
http://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/2018/08/textusa-tale-of-tactical-text-abuse.html
The truth and textusa have never got along, and it's because of people like them and Tony Bennett, that those who genuinely believe the McCanns to be guilty, are fooled into believing a number of things are stone wall facts when they're not. It's these lies that are told from the aforementioned pair of wazzocks, that can be easily refuted by team McCann and as such make genuine antis who trust the two, to be easily laughed off.
I'm not going to spend a lot of time on this, so let's get down to business.
Yesterday, whilst Textusa was scouring Twitter so they could do their usual troll's trick of copying and pasting others tweets in a feeble and bitter attempt to discredit them, they decided it would be my turn.
The tweets they chose were of my personal opinion on the alerts to the McCanns' hire car:
Textusa12 May 2019, 10:16:00
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1127320339539746816
⚡Bugsy ⚡ @TheBunnyReturnz
Replying to @regretkay @MancunianMEDlC and
Personally I don't think Madeleine was ever in the hire car. There's certainly no proof of it...or wasn't when the PJ shelved their case in 2008.
2:11 PM - 11 May 2019
(…)
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1127323773118627840
⚡Bugsy ⚡ @TheBunnyReturnz
Replying to @maxine68711804 @regretkay and 34 others
Of course. We can form opinions based upon behaviour, but for me personally I won't subscribe to the theory that Madeleine's body was in the boot because there's no publicly available proof to support that theory.
10:25 pm - 11 May 2019
...and so it begins, the bitter bullshitter who is too much of a coward to comment anywhere unless they have full control over what is and isn't published decides to copy my tweets.
For the record, I've said for many years that the alerts to the hire car didn't necessarily mean a corpse had been in the boot. Proof of this can be found in any of the groups I've commented in, and to the idiot who says they thought my account was a "spoof", you'd do well to read the files before you make a gigantic tit of yourself.
As for the "approved theory" and the alerts from Eddie to the hire car, who would be the best person to quote? Someone who knew the dogs better than anyone else.
Eddie and Keela's handler, Martin Grime:
"It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent'
contaminant OR human blood scent."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm
You might be asking yourself why Martin would say that? Why he would say Eddie's alert could be to human blood. That's because like Bennett, the fuckwitted blogger didn't tell you that Eddie also alerted to human blood. They don't tell you because it doesn't fit with their theories.
It's the simplest thing in the world to grasp and it's all available to read in the files, and indeed on part one of this blog, where myself and Syn debunked every pro McCann excuse for the dogs' alerts:
http://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-truth-of-dogs-mccann-case-and-more.html
Eddie
"The dog (Eddie) EVRD is trained using whole and disintegrated material, blood, bone tissue, teeth, etc. and decomposed cross-contaminants. The dog will recognize all or parts of a human cadaver. He is not trained for 'live' human odours; no trained dog will recognize the smell of 'fresh blood'. They find, however, and give the alert for dried blood from a live human being."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm
Keela
"The dog that alerts to human blood is trained exclusively for this purpose, and includes its components, plasma, red cells, white cells and platelets. Given the nature of the training, the dog will not alert to urine, saliva, semen, sweat, nasal secretion, vaginal secretion or human skin unless these are mixed with blood."
So, we have Eddie who is trained to alert to the target scent of a human corpse and also human blood.
We have Keela who alerts to human blood only.
Eddie and Keela were used in tandem as a fail-safe method to eliminate any chance of false positives.
Eddie's original training was to human blood, and latterly, to cadaver scent using pigs and human cadavers; Keela purely to detect human blood. That's why the dogs were used in tandem.
Eddie would be sent in first to a location as part of an investigation to check if he alerted, then Keela was sent in to see if she also alerted. If Keela also alerted then the alert was to blood, as that is all that Keela is trained to detect. If she did not alert also, then Eddie was alerting to cadaver scent.
It's not difficult, is it? Apparently, for the bumbling half-wit, it's more difficult than swallowing hedgehog whole.
When faced with a fact from an anonymous visitor...
Quite what Donald Trump has to do with the dogs' alerts is anyone's guess, but one of textusa's main tactics is to go off on a tangent, hoping to bore his opponent into submission. It's what trolls do, and textusa is one of the most prolific.
The next response from a reader has been "censored" for no other reason than it contained facts textusa didn't want to share.
Now as anyone knows, I support the vast majority of what Goncalo Amaral says, unlike textusa who discredits him at every turn. However, when it comes to the dogs, the only expert in Portugal, was Martin Grime. Portugal had never used EVRD or CSI dogs and so the police there weren't fully aware of how they worked. That's not to say Amaral was wrong in his assertation, just that my opinion differs, as does that of anon below:
Now here's where things get highly entertaining. With spade in hand, textusa begins to dig. The bumbling blogger digs so deep, that it becomes obvious he's never read the parts of the files that refer to the dogs. For someone who acts like they're the font of all knowledge on the case, who mocks others on a daily basis, who trolls people calling them "thick" for not subscribing to a flimsy theory they show no evidence for, this is where it gets really embarrassing:
I can only assume textusa has never been in a car, because how in the name of shivering shite, do they think it funny that it's not a fact that Gerry McCann's hand, the one with a cut that was proven to have deposited blood onto the keyfob didn't then touch the steering wheel, or that the keyfob itself didn't come into contact with the car?
Five-year-old children would know this. They know to turn a key in a toy car "brum brum, parp parp" and they know to put their hands on the wheel.
But never mind that, look at the files:
"Thus, the Renault Scenic vehicle was moved to parking level -3 and subjected to an expert
examination by officers from the Police Science Laboratory and another canine inspection that
began at 03h49 on 7 August 2007 by the dog Keela, that detects traces of human blood, it having
been verified the following result: 03h53 - the dog 'marked' an area of the lower right-hand side of the interior part of the baggage compartment of the car; 04h11 - the dog 'marked' the 'tidy' compartment [map/glove pocket] on the side of the driver's door, which was found to contain the car key, the plastic electronic card type, with a key-ring of the Budget rental company."
The car key was in the fucking car! The dipstick - not the one under the bonnet of the Scenic, but the one that thought it would be hilarious to put a string of laughing emojis, didn't even know where the key was found!
Anon replied to textusa:
Well said, anon! But wait, here comes more madness, and titter ye not, it's textusa again.
Now I don't know about you, but if you're going to "LOLOL" and cry laughing, then it's always wise to know the difference between knowing you're shit and knowing your shit - textusa is the former.
What they're actually saying is that every single alert by Eddie was a cadaver alert, despite the fact that Eddie alerted to human blood as well, and despite the fact that Keela (blood only dog) alerted to some of the same places. Bear with me, it'll get better.
It would seem not, anon.
In the distance, can be heard the galloping of hooves, a sound of a bugle...is it the cavalry? No, it's the wooden-headed wing-nut, Whispering. Here he is now.
Whispering has come to back textusa up and support the claim that the alerts to the car were cadaver alerts, only the vapid fool chooses a section of the files that relates to Keela, the human blood only dog.
Silly Whispering.
What Whispering has actually done, is to reinforce the fact that Eddie made blood alerts to the keyfob. How do we know this? Because Keela alerted, Eddie alerted, and...
"An incomplete, low-level DNA profile that matched corresponding components in the profile of Gerald McCann was obtained from cellular material present on the card key - (286C/2007-CRL (12))."
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm
Both dogs did exactly what they were trained to do - they alerted to the scent of human blood, Gerry's blood. The dogs are not trained to differentiate from one human to the next, but only to alert to the scent they're trained to. Which is exactly what they did.
But, textusa still thinks it's a fact that despite Gerry's blood being on the car key, identified as such, and alerted to by two dogs able to detect human blood, that the alerts show the key came into contact with a dead body.
textusa grabs the spade once more and...no, not that one, a spade for diggi...never mind.
Anon hits the nail on the head with:
...and she's right
I forgot to show you textusa's disdain for Goncalo Amaral, didn't I. Remember I only published a couple of tweets, stating my opinion, one based on facts? Well, here's textusa at their spiteful best, berating a theory of Goncalo Amaral...and a few of us know why
.For us, and we are giving a personal opinion, the coffin theory is so absurd that it falls out of the possible (the dog alerts on the Scenic contradict it and the coffin theory is based on somebody having said that they saw people by the church at odd hours in night but these statements are not in the files nor have they ever been identified (probably because they don’t exist or if they do, are fantasists)) and so, if we were in charge of the investigation, we would waste little resources to it or even none.
textusa is claiming that Goncalo Amaral's theory is "absurd". They're even going as far to say he's lied about witnesses. Back in 2014, I was told by two very reliable sources that Goncalo Amaral cannot abide textusa, and with words like the above, coupled with textusa's fondness for portraying the PJ as inept, it's hardly surprising.
Anon goes on to educate the useless blogger further:
"As much of a blood dog as he was EVRD"? Have you ever heard of anything so ridiculous in your entire life? As much of a blood dog? What the fuck-a-doodle-do is going on in textusa's head here?
Picture the scene, Eddie is at a crime scene, his handler, Martin Grime at his side. All of a sudden, Eddie gets a whiff of blood, he's just about to alert when another scent comes to him from the bedroom, "ooooooo cadaver" thinks Eddie, "I much prefer that smell to blood! I'm going to go through there and alert instead."
Bimbling buffoonary. A dog will alert to what it's trained to alert to, it doesn't prioritise. It doesn't favour one scent over another. This is just yet another example of textusa inventing complete and utter twaddle.
The answer, which I'm told textusa refused to publish, is simple.
Yes, Keela did alert to the fob, I've shown you that above. If you or Whimpering had actually read his comment, you'd have seen that Keela alerted to the fob.
Why didn't Keela alert to the door seal?
Because, as I said at the start of the blog, the dogs were used in tandem. Eddie alerted to the door seal, he could smell one of the scents he was trained to alert to coming from the door. At that point, Keela was brought to the car and alerted in several areas. Eddie wasn't required in the car because he'd have only alerted to the same places. If you think he'd have found a different spot that wouldn't have corroborated with Keela's alert (I'm aiming this comment at textusa), then not only do you have no idea where a car key goes or where the driver's hands go, but you must also think a car is the size of a fucking house, you absolute shit-biscuit.
...and to the wankers that joined the thread at the end whilst textusa allowed no further comments that showed him to be incorrect, you're as ill-informed as the melon you read and revere.
Before I conclude, let's take a look at what the soundly beaten textusa signed off with.
Did textusa admit to being totally wrong about the dogs?
Of course not, the obsessive pillock reverted to old faithful:
Insinuate anyone who doesn't agree with misinformation and lies has a plan, that they're part of a gang and that they work for the government.
The wardrobe in the parents' bedroom. Bear in mind that whilst this alert was directly at the wardrobe, due to airflow (something else numb-nuts doesn't understand) the actual location of the target scent could have been somewhere else in that room.
When Martin Grime states that the scent source can be in a different place to where it can end up, he is referring to cadaver scent, not blood.
There were no blood alerts in that room! Keela did not alert.
"What we have to be able to understand in a situation such as this is in a hot climate with the apartment being closed down, the scent will build up in a particular area. If there isn't a scent source in here, i.e. a physical article where the scent is emitting from, any scent residue will collect in a particular place due to the air movement of the flat, the apartment and what I would say in this case, is that there is enough scent in that area there for him to give me a bark indication but the source may not be in that cupboard, the source may well be in this room somewhere else, but the air is actually pushing into that corner. But *strong indication and I would say it's positive for things that he is trained to find, which will be part of a separate debrief."
For me, that is the alert that tells us Madeleine's body was in the parents' bedroom. Keela's alerts were superb, she alerted to what she was trained to alert to, and most were corroborated by Eddie, but because tests couldn't confirm anything that could be used in court, their importance diminishes as far as securing a conviction goes. That isn't "dissing" the dogs, if anything it's human failure, either by the way the swabs were taken (I don't think that's the case), or by the method used by the FSS, as covered in the link below:http://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/2016/10/
Whilst we have morons like Tony Bennett and textusa telling us total lies about what the dogs found, then it's no surprise that people wonder why arrests haven't been made. This is a very complex case, far too complex for the likes of textusa and Bennett to comprehend and the reason for that is simple.
The pair of them are so far up their own arses, twisting the evidence and lying about the case so they can stroke their massive egos, that they couldn't see daylight if they bent over and mooned at the sun.
If anyone who comments on this case is lying about and discrediting the dogs, it's the pros and idiots like textusa, who, for all intents and purposes is as close to being a pro as you'll find.
