Nick Pisa is to truth, what Quasimodo was to glamour shoots. How in God's name does this lying toe-rag get away with printing the absolute tripe he does? Just take a look at his latest. This is seriously libellous, and should see the slimy bastard in court:
By Nick Pisa in Strasbourg
You're as much in Strasbourg, Nick, as I am in bed with Mila Kunis.
Madfiie McCann went missing over a decade ago while on a family holiday in Portugal
You can't even spell Madeleine's name right, you useless sack of shit.
Kate and Gerry McCann are in a legal battle with Amaral at the European Court of Human Rights over the smears.
Are they fuck. There is no listing for any case with Kate and Gerry McCann, and even if there were, the case would be against Portugal, not Goncalo Amaral, you imbecilic idiot.
Kate and Gerry, who have fought a lengthy legal battle to stop Amaral cashing in, are currently challenging him at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
See above. They are not.
A source close to them said: “If Goncalo Amaral continues to make these outrageous claims then he will find he has a tough fight on his hands.
“Kate and Gerry are not going to let him get away with what he said about them.”
You're source is a total invention, as is your story.
Amaral’s earnings from the book are revealed in documents filed at the ECHR.
They show he made 342,111 euros from book sales in 2008-2009 and another 40,000 euros from the DVD spin-off.
No, these figures were revealed at the Supreme Court in Portugal. You haven't seen any papers from the ECHR. There is NO case in Strasbourg.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Supreme_Court_31_01_2017.htm#32
The book was translated into multiple languages, with more than 180,000 copies printed. There are fears Amaral plans a follow-up.
You also got this from the Supreme Court in Portugal.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Supreme_Court_31_01_2017.htm#31
They won the case in 2015 but the ruling was overturned on appeal — a decision upheld by Portugal’s Supreme Court. Amaral was awarded compensation.
The McCanns were ordered to pay Goncalo Amaral's legal fees, that's all. They began the case, they lost. This is the norm. You are a sycophantic pseudologist!
The injunction on the book was also lifted, leading to thousands more sales and even more cash for Amaral. He is said to have made at least £20,000 from interviews with newspapers and TV stations.
So? You make money from selling fictitious fuckery to the most despised rag in the UK.
The McCanns have gone to the ECHR in a final effort to avoid paying Amaral £750,000 in compensation.
The figure of £750,000 was plucked from thin air by you, and that other bubble-blowing, bullshit bringer - Tracey "ooo what a big wine glass" Kandohla.
The McCanns are not in Strasbourg. One does not simply rock up to the ECHR, and present a case.
- The first step for anyone seeking to apply to the ECHR, is to download an application form, and fill every section out, meticulously, and in full.
- If any parts of the form are incomplete, illegible, or incorrect, then the court could well end the claim right there. (These ladies and gents do not fuck about).
- Once the form is completed, it must be sent to the ECHR in Strasbourg.
- Upon arrival at Strasbourg, the application form will be sent to the appropriate legal division. In this case, it would be a division that included Portuguese speakers, who also have expertise in Portuguese litigation.
- The file will then be given a number, and examined by a lawyer.
- The court may then contact the applicant, and ask for further information. If this isn't sent immediately, the court can, and will, terminate the application.
- Other than the court requesting information, and the applicant sending it, the latter must NOT contact the court. (Can you imagine Gerry being able to adhere to that rule?)
- The court receives over 50,000 applicants a year, of those only a staggeringly low 5% actually reach the judgement stage. You feeling lucky Kate and Gerry?
- "If your application is clearly inadmissible because it does not meet all the required admissibility criteria, it will be dealt with by a single judge. The inadmissibility decision given by that judge is final. You will be informed by letter, but you will not receive a copy of the decision. It is not possible to challenge the inadmissibility decision or request any further information about it. The Court will close the case and the file will be destroyed at a later date"
- In all cases, once the ECHR decides, at any stage, that an application is inadmissible, or it is rejected, then that's it; game over; you had your chance; you blew it.
Now, let's get down to some juicier bits.
One of the questions that we've seen crop up a few times, is this:
If the McCanns begin the appeal process, will Goncalo Amaral's assets be frozen once more, and will the costs Kate and Gerry were ordered to pay, be suspended pending the outcome of the ECHR?
The wonderful news, if you're sat on the Amaral side of the fence, is that until a final verdict is reached by the ECHR, they don't have the power to overturn, suspend, or alter any decision made by the Portuguese, as confirmed by the ECHR below:
"If I apply to the Court, does it mean I do not have to
comply with the final judgement given by the domestic
courts?
No, applying to the Court has no suspensive effect. You must
comply with the final decisions of the national courts even if you
lodge an application with the Strasbourg Court."
So no get out there. If Kate and Gerry were hoping to delay payment (whilst they squirrelled away more of the donations given to them to find their daughter), by slapping in an application to the ECHR, they'd better have a rethink; it won't work.
The current backlog of cases, means that any application could take up to a year, and more, to reach the appeal stage. Plenty of time for the McCanns to pay up, or find themselves arrested.
Another question that is included in the ECHR many information sheets, is this one:
"What is the European Court of Human Rights
not able to do for me?
The Court does not act as a court of appeal in relation to national
courts (the Supreme Court in Lisbon being one of these); it does not rehear cases, it cannot quash, vary or revise
their decisions.
The Court will not intercede directly on your behalf with the authority you are complaining about. In exceptional circumstances the Court may, however, grant interim measures.
As a matter of practice it only does so where there is a serious risk of physical harm to the applicant.
The Court will not help you find or pay a lawyer to draw up your application.
The Court cannot give you any information on legal provisions in force in the State against which your complaints are directed."
More on the how applications to the European Court of Human Rights, can be read on the following links:
http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Your_Application_ENG.pdf
http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Questions_Answers_ENG.pdf
So, if the McCanns are indeed having utopian ideas of starting further desperate, and pitiful attempts to destroy Snr. Amaral, I would suggest that fantasy land is where they will be born and reality be there resting place
But it could take until 2021 before the judges decide.
What judges would they be then, dick-brain!
The McCanns fear if they lose, Amaral’s payout will wipe away what is left in the fund set up to finance the continuing search for Madeleine.
My heart bleeds. Firstly, it won't wipe out the fund.
Secondly, it was never set up to search for Madeleine, the LIMITED COMPANY was set up "mainly for legal fees"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML-gTcKDKrM
Thirdly, the McCanns should have thought of that before they GAMBLED the cash on the pursuit of one man.
Sources close to the family also fear Brexit may have an impact — with judges taking “vengeance” over Britain leaving the EU by ruling against them.
You're madder than Tony Bennet, on magic mushrooms, in a dimly lit public toilet!
In their argument to the ECHR, the McCanns’ legal team describe the pain and emotional agony Kate and Gerry have gone though since Madeleine disappeared during a family holiday in Praia da Luz in May 2007.
Yawn! Again, this description was in the writ to the Portuguese courts. As I keep saying, you have no idea what, if anything has been sent to the ECHR.
They detail the anguish of the couple being absurdly made suspects by the Portuguese police followed by the pain of Amaral’s outlandish accusations.
The McCanns were made arguidos in full accordance with Portuguese law. The only thing that is absurd here is you, Nick.
I can't be arsed to copy and paste anymore of this shit. The Sun have a long history of employing the services of the dregs of society, the filth that gathers around the toilet rim, the 1% of germs that even Domestos can't touch. Depraved liars, hellbent on earning a crust from covering up corruption and crimes against innocent people.
Nick Pisa, take a bow - you lying piece of shit!
I hope Goncalo Amaral sues the lot of you filthy bastards.
