Wednesday, 10 June 2015

21 FACTS ABOUT THE DISAPPEARANCE OF MADELEINE McCANN.


https://www.facebook.com/groups/HiDeHoCONTROVERSYofMadeleineMcCann/?fref=ts


Most of the country do not trust Kate and Gerry McCann, despite the MSM's recent efforts to avoid saying anything against the couple for fear of being sued. Here are some basic facts, with links from the official police files, direct quotes, photographs, and videos to back them up. If you'd like to learn more I highly recommend joining, or following the above groups. 


FACT 1.

A statement was taken by Leicestershire Police from Katherina Gaspar. That statement raised serious questions about Gerry McCann, and one of his friends, David Payne. Katherina was on holiday with the McCanns and David Payne in 2005. It was on this holiday, that she witnessed the two men having a discussion, and making sexual gestures. Horrifyingly, she believes they were discussing Madeleine at the time.

Despite the statement being given to Leicestershire Police only two weeks after Madeleine was reported missing, it wasn't passed onto the Portuguese authorities, until October 24, 2007, after the McCanns had been questioned as arguido (suspects), and after the coordinator of the investigation, had been inexplicably removed from the case, and only then, because the PJ requested it.


FACT 2.

The McCanns claim they were doing regular checks whilst they left their three children in the apartment, alone at night.

Gerry McCann:

"The kids were sound asleep and they were being checked regularly. We didn't think we needed a babysitter. We are good parents and what we did felt perfectly reasonable at the time."

"It's like we were sat in our back garden, all be it at the end of our garden."

Yet a neighbour heard one of the children crying out for approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. This crying went on until the parents arrived home. To leave a child alone, and crying for a parent is neglectful, pure and simple.


FACT 3.

The nannies who were said to be in contact with Madeleine in the days leading up to her being reported missing, all tell a different story. With regards to confirmed contact, no one statement matches.


(confirming links to the official police files are within the above blog entry)

FACT 4.

On the night Madeleine was reported missing, the McCanns and their friends state that regular checks were being made upon the children. Gerry McCann claims he was only away from the table for a matter of minutes at the time it is believed Madeleine was "taken", a claim not backed up by one of the friends who states that:
"Kate had been moaning that you'd been gone a long time watching the football" 

At this point Gerry McCann has no alibi for longer than 2 minutes.



FACT 5.

One of the group of friends, Matt Oldfield claims, in his statement, that he went to check on the McCann children just after 9:30pm, however, he cannot state whether Madeleine was in her bed or not, despite having a clear view, and stating that he could see the twins breathing in the same room, the picture below illustrates where Matt would have been stood as he entered the room. Madeleine's bed is immediately to his left, the twins cot beyond it, in the centre of the room. 



FACT 6.

At 9:55pm, a family witnessed a man carrying a small child toward the beach, not 5 minutes away from where Gerry McCann was last seen. This family were said to be convinced the little girl was Madeleine McCann, the head of the family was up to 80% sure that the man carrying her was Gerry McCann.


FACT 7.

The above sighting is the main focus of New Scotland Yard's investigation, who described it as a "revelation moment". Another man was seen passing by the McCann's apartment, but was ruled out by both police forces, having come forward and identified himself. Despite this, the McCanns still promote him as a suspect.

FACT 8.

Despite the McCanns having the evidence of the sighting in their hands since November 2008, it took them 5 years to put the efit on their Official Find Madeleine page, and only then a few weeks after Scotland Yard put it up on Crimewatch.



FACT 9.

Kate McCann got up to "check" on her children at 10pm. Only she wasn't actually going to "check", despite having walked all the way to the apartment. I realise how ludicrous that sounds, and that's probably because it is. The link below takes you to a video of Kate McCann giving the most implausible account of her "check" that evening.


FACT 10.

Kate McCann refused to give a detailed statement, as to what happened when she claims she realised Madeleine was missing. In fact she refused to answer any questions about what she saw, what she did, or where she looked after 10pm, immediately prior to her raising the alarm, when, according to her sister in law, she came out of the apartment, leaving the twins behind, shouting: "THEY'VE TAKEN HER"





FACT 11.

The McCanns did not search for Madeleine. Apart from a brief look around the immediate vicinity, and a trip down to the beach for Gerry, where he didn't actually search, but was "consoled" by a friend (David Payne), Kate and Gerry did not search until 6am the following morning.



FACT 12.

The McCanns lied to their friends back in the UK. As hard as that is to believe, the McCanns claimed that an intruder had "broken" "smashed" "jemmied" the shutters, and taken Madeleine out of the window. All this took place whilst scores of locals and guests searched for Madeleine McCann. Yep, whilst all that was going on, the McCanns weren't searching, they were creating lies.


The story was eventually retracted, and corrected by their spokesman Clarence Mitchell, and only after a documentary, by Channel 4 dispatches, proved that no break in had taken place. Mitchell stated that:

"There was no evidence of a break-in"

FACT 13.

On May 4th 2007, the morning after Madeleine was reported missing, Yvonne Martin, who worked for child protection services in England, and who was also on holiday in Portugal, introduced herself to the McCanns outside their apartment. She showed them her identification, and offered to help them. Curiously, and despite no leads, Kate McCann told her that Madeleine had been abducted by a couple. This claim also ties in with the report of Kate shouting, "THEY'VE TAKEN HER", but with no leads, how could Kate be so sure?

Stood with the McCanns at the time was David Payne, the man accused of making sexual gestures about Madeleine. It was Payne who pulled the couple away from Yvonne Martin, and after whispering to them, ushered them inside. Payne then returned to the street, where he told Yvonne Martin that the couple did not require her assistance.

Yvonne Martin states that she recognized Payne from the course of her work, and indeed, her concerns were great enough for her to write a letter to british police, stating that she felt the parents were involved in the disappearance of Madeleine. She also noted that Payne was wearing the same clothes, as a description of as man police had said was carrying a small child, the previous night.

Yvonne Martin also asked the police to check if David Payne was, or had been on any child abuse, or paedophile registers.


FACT 14.

A Ltd company was set up within days of Madeleine going missing. This wasn't a charity, it was and still is, a Ltd company. You'd be forgiven for thinking the company, called the Madeleine Fund, Leaving No Stone Unturned, was set up to find Madeleine, not so, it was set up "mainly for legal expenditure", as the video below proves.


FACT 15.

The McCanns made mortgage payments on their house in Rothley, directly from the fund.


FACT 16.

Madeleine's birthday, May 12th 2007, 9 days after Madeleine was reported missing. The following excerpt is taken from Kate McCann's book, and describes in her words how their mood was on this day:

”We ate mostly in silence, concentrating on the kids. I couldn't eat much, and alcohol was completely off my agenda. Fiona recalls that Gerry and I were completely shut down that day, barely able to talk, and although our friends tried to remain cheerful and behave normally to get us through it, they all felt awkward about being at this lovely villa, in the sunshine, in these circumstances. There was no cake. Gerry did attempt a toast but he was visibly upset and couldn't manage much more than ‘I can’t even say happy birthday to my daughter . . .’ before choking up. The physical loss was more intense than ever. I ached for Madeleine."

This is just one of the many blatant lies that appear in the book. Here we see a photograph, and below a video, taken on that very day, that shows the parents, and in particular, Gerry McCann, behaving in a manner totally different to the one Kate describes in her book.




FACT 17.

May 21st 2007, the McCanns meet with Labour Government spin doctor, Clarence Mitchell. In an unprecedented move, Mitchell is deployed to deal with the press on behalf of the McCanns. Mitchell's involvement in the case hindered the police investigation, he also lied to the press. Here are just some of his lies:

“There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, nothing, to suggest Madeleine has been harmed, let alone killed” LIE

and an odd statement to make given that in 2008 he also said:

“Madeleine is probably dead”

“I can categorically state that Gerry did not have a blue tennis bag” LIE

When talking about the Helping to find Madeleine fund Mitchell described it as:

“Independently controlled” LIE

“Kate and Gerry would have no issue with taking a lie detector test” LIE

“There are wholly innocent explanations for any material the police may or may not have found”

When talking about the “tapas 7” and the McCann’s he stated:

“None of them were wearing watches or had mobile phones on them that evening” LIE

“Kate and Gerry have been utterly honest, and utterly open with the police and all of their statements since the moment Madeleine was taken” LIE

“We have nothing to hide” LIE

“We are always willing to cooperate with the Portuguese police” LIE

The head of the Portuguese police department Carlos Anjos described Clarence Mitchell as “a manipulative liar” TRUE

He also said that “He lies with as many teeth as he has in his mouth” TRUE

FACT 18.

May 29th, despite the possibility of an abductor still being at large, the McCanns embark on a European tour, leaving their twins behind in the very town they claim Madeleine was abducted from. Let's just say your child was abducted after you weren't there to protect them.

Would you really do it again, less than 3 weeks later?

Would you trust anyone other than yourself to look after your two youngest children?

In fact only the day before Kate was telling the press how:

'she could not face sleeping away from the twins. She said: "We've become totally protective parents."' - Daily Mirror 28 May 2007

Of course, yet again, Kate McCann was lying.


FACT 19.

The dogs, possibly the most damning element against the McCanns.

Let's have a look at their findings:

Keela, a 16 month old springer spaniel, was at the top of her field when she went to PDL in 2007, trained by Martin Grime (who now works for the FBI) she could sniff out the most microscopic specks of blood, even if the item had been cleaned or washed. To avoid any confusion Keela was trained to alert to nothing but human blood. So any talk of her alerting to anything else is pure fiction. At the time of the searches Keela earned £530 per day plus expenses, more than the chief constable at that time.

Eddie (pictured right) who was 7 at the time, had worked on over 200 cases worldwide and boasts an outstanding record of success. The FBI rated Eddie and Martin Grime as "two of the best in the law enforcement speciality of canine forensics, able to find evidence everyone else missed." Eddie was trained to alert to smell of human cadaverine (the smell given off from a human corpse) pro McCann's love to put about unfounded rumours that these dogs alert to other smells, nonsense, it was the McCanns who blamed the alerts on items such as dirty nappies, seabass etc.

To give a better idea a dogs nose is 10,000 times more sensitive to smell than our own. They can pick out every ingredient of a smell and separate it, much in the same way you or I could sort out different shaped wooden blocks, if we were handed a box of blocks containing sphere's, cubes, and pyramids, and told to put all the cubes to one side we could do it. A cadaver dogs nose works in the same way, it separates all the elements of one scent, examines each one in it's own right, and determines if human cadaver is present.

So what did the dogs find? Having gone through several other apartments at the Ocean club, and alerting to nothing, both dogs alerted to a number of places in and around the McCann's apartment, and their hire car.

Keela (below) alerted to human blood in:

The living room, behind the sofa, close to the external window of the apartment.
In the McCanns’ hired Renault Scenic, hired 25 days AFTER Madeleine's disappearance.
On the car key.
In the interior of the car boot.

Eddie alerted to the scent of human cadaverine:

The wardrobe in the McCann's bedroom.
In the living room, behind the sofa, close to the external window of the apartment. (the same place as Keela).
The veranda of 5a.
In the garden of the apartment.
The flower beds in the back of 5a.
The steps leading down from the patio.
Also, a ‘lighter’ scent of death was found in the flower beds in the back yard, near the foot of the steps leading down from the patio.
On two items of Kate's clothing.
On a T shirt belonging to Madeleine.
On cuddlecat (Madeleine's soft toy)
Not only that, but out of several cars in a car park Eddie only alerted to one, the McCanns' hire car.

Couple that with the fact that it was Eddie and Keela's findings led the forensic team to the discovery of DNA that could have belonged to Madeleine. In fact the original forensic conclusions were that it was DEFINITELY Madeleine's, that was later changed to say "It would be very simple to say "yes" simply because of the number of components within the result that are also in her reference sample." The reason for that change was that John Lowe who compiled the report said he couldn't be certain how the sample came to be in the car. I fail to see what that has to do with the DNA being Madeleine's or not. It either is or it isn't.

Below are three videos showing Eddie and Keela's searches.



....and here more information on their findings.


FACT 20.

The refusal of a reconstruction.

Crime reconstructions are a vital part of police forces investigations Worldwide, they give a clearer picture of what actually happened. It's all very well having all the pieces of a jigsaw, but without the picture on the lid of the box it can be difficult to put the pieces together, especially when, as was the case with the McCann's and their friends statements, those pieces don't fit.

In 2008 Ricardo Paiva, an Inspector with the PJ, sent an email to Mick Graham, Detective Inspector of the Major Crime Unit. In this email Ricardo requested that the tapas 7 (the group of friends who were on holiday with the McCanns) be contacted with a view to attending a reconstruction. What followed was a series of ridiculous demands by the group of friends, followed by the refusal to take part. Below are the first set of questions, followed by Ricardo Paiva's replies:

1 - Why do the PJ want them to take part in the re-enactment?

2 - What is the aim, what are the PJ trying to achieve with the re-enactment?

3 - Why so close to the anniversary?

4 - Why don't the PJ use actors?

5 - Will the footage of the re-enactment be released to the press/TV etc?

6 - What protection is there for the friends in relation to the media coverage/likely frenzy?"
The responses from Ricardo were more than satisfactory:

1 - Why do the PJ want them to take part in the re-enactment?

The PJ wants them to take part in the re-enactment because they were the ones who experienced the situation. Therefore, they are in the best conditions to reproduce it.

2 - What is the aim, what are the PJ trying to achieve with the re-enactment?

The PJ is trying to find out, with accuracy, the circumstances of the events occurred, using for that purpose the exact place of events and the same persons who took part in it.

3 - Why so close to the anniversary?

Only now has the PJ conditions to carry out these proceedings, and also because it is desirable that the weather conditions are as similar as possible to those at the time of the events.

4 - Why don't the PJ use actors?

The reason is because only the persons involved can clarify, with accuracy and at the same place, their position and movements.

5 - Will the footage of the re-enactment be released to the press/TV etc?

The PJ won't release any pictures/footage to the press.

6 - What protection is there for the friends in relation to the media coverage/like frenzy?

The place will be isolated and press interference will be avoided to its maximum.

The re-enactment will be carried out in one single day, at the exact time the events occurred.

However, the witnesses are requested to stay in Portugal for a couple of days more, in order to allow the production of all the material which shall be analysed, checked and signed by the persons involved."


So having asked 7 questions of the PJ and duly been given the answers you'd expect the tapas 7 to be more than willing to help, you'd be wrong. Their next move was to start haggling with the PJ, putting forward demands that needed satisfying before they would co-operate:

Russell O'Brien and Jane Tanner demanded the PJ;

• publicly dispels the damaging and disturbing lies churned out by the Portuguese press regarding alleged changes to statements, re-interviews or alleged lack of co-operation.

• publicly states there are "no suspicions over [us] regarding the commission of any criminal acts." This in no way compromises Judicial Secrecy.

Rachael O'Brien wrote:

Either they believe our version of the events of May 3rd 2007, or they don't. If they do, why the need for a reconstruction?

If they don't believe us, do they want a reconstruction so we can convince them otherwise?

If the purpose of a reconstruction is to convince the Prosecutor to lift Kate and Gerry's arguido status then we would consider taking part in it. If it is to properly focus the investigation on the person seen carrying a child away from the apartment, again, we would consider taking part because that would help to find Madeleine.

That would be the sighting Jane Tanner stands accused of lying about. The sighting she changed her description of several times, the sighting that has now been ruled out of the investigation by Scotland Yard, and indeed the sighting that is still promoted by the Official find Madeleine page.

Are you starting to get an idea of how impossible the PJ's job was?

The full details can be viewed on the link below:


FACT 21.

Kate and Gerry McCann have never been cleared of being involved in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.

Jose de Magalhaes e Menezes was, along with João Melchior Gomes the man responsible for producing a 58-page report - the concluding volume of the case files - which explained the reasons behind the decision to archive the process.

Despite reports on Wikipedia and some pro McCann forums this report did NOT clear the McCann's of any involvement in the loss of Madeleine, in fact by raising doubt over their stories it did quite the opposite, below are some quotes from the report:

“The witnesses’ statements revealed important details which were not entirely understood and coherent”.

“The technique for this is a reconstruction, but despite every effort by the Public Prosecutor’s office and the JP [Policia Judiciara]…this was not possible”.

“The work of these dogs can be appreciated much better on film...the dogs are trained in detecting dead persons".

“The fact that the parents were the last people known to have been with Madeleine, alive and in a known place, particularly with the possibility of a body having been in the apartment and in the vehicle used by the parents…meant they had to be placed under suspicion. The parents had no plausible explanation for these facts. Faced with the evidence produced by the dogs and the laboratories, they had to be named as suspects…”

"The possibility of abduction was exhaustively investigated. No ransom was ever requested, nor were there any sufficiently consistent clues found to support this theory”.

“…the parents were the last people known to have been with Madeleine, alive and in a known place…the possibility of a body having been in the apartment and in the vehicle used by the parents were reasons for suspecting their involvement. As they were called once more to make a statement, having no plausible explanation for these facts and faced with evidence produced by the dogs…they had to be named as suspects…”

So far from being cleared the McCann's it would seem STILL have questions to answer, plausible explanations to give.......remember Kate refusing to answer those 48 questions? Neither Kate or Gerry have been interviewed by the PJ since. The attorney general wasn't the only person to doubt the McCann's:

Moite Flores, former police inspector and now political commentator in Portugal: “The only thing proven was that there was no abduction. I have no doubt that the child died”

Lee Rainbow, Britain’s top criminal profiler: “Madeleine's father was the last one to see her alive. The family is a lead that should be followed. Contradictions in Gerald McCann's statements might lead us to suspect a homicide”.

Assistant Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police (2007): “While both or one of [the McCanns] may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance”.

Former top British detective, John Stalker: “My gut instinct is that some big secret is probably being covered up”.

Ricardo Paiva, one of the chief detectives on the original investigation, told a Lisbon court in January 2010: “I share Gonçalo Amaral’s statement in the book. Maddie died, probably in a tragic accident, and all indications point towards the parents hiding the body”.

Director of the Portuguese National Counter-Terrorism Unit, Luís Neves: “Hiding a body and accidental death are possibilities”.

Intercalary report: Chief Inspector Tavares Almeida: "Kate McCann and Gerald McCann are involved in the concealment of the cadaver of their daughter, Madeleine McCann"

And of course the main man, Goncalo Amaral: "Let's remember: it is totally logical to find Madeleine's DNA in the home, but absolutely not in a car rented more than twenty days after her disappearance."

"The McCanns knew that I was going to get them."

If only the political interference hadn't halted the case and those queries and questions had been cleared up.

If only good old fashioned policing had been able to run its course.

If only...................


The official police files can be read at: http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TRANSLATIONS.htm

There is also a extensive catalogue of news stories, and information at: http://www.mccannfiles.com/id71.html

50 comments:

  1. That cheered me up! Great post and lots of info. Getting the bare facts out there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Tigger, hopefully it will be seen by those who aren't already aware of some of the basics. We can go round in circles, but unless more people see the facts, and can see that it isn't made up, we'll never get anywhere.

      Delete
    2. the only way to clear the mccanns is for them to take lie detector if they refuse then shows there guilt ive said from day1 its them

      Delete
    3. Great post. James Bulger's parents split up, Sarah Payne's parents split up. Fred and Rose West, Kate and Gerry McCann - couples who slay together, stay together!

      Delete
  2. Thank you for that information. It's about time our Government stopped protecting people, and allowed the Police to do a proper investigation, the amount of lies, and confusion, surrounding this case is astounding, and IS NOT what the British taxpayers expect!!! Those parent's should be questioned again there's no doubt about that, we've been misled for long enough. If this case goes unchallenged then what hope is there for the future? All those unanswered questions need answering, never mind "NO COMMENT" If they were telling the truth they wouldn't need to avoid answering would they? This case will be remembered long after I depart this world, and will set a precedence for cases of a similar nature. Lawyer's will be advising their clients just reply with a no comment, and no questions will be asked. What a cop-out, and what a mockery of our justice system.

    I believe Sr Amaral would have cracked this case had he been allowed to continue his line of investigation, without interference from various quarters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem we face is getting past those who lie and throw a blanket over the truth. There are two sides to every story, it's a pity the media only have the guts to report one. We deal in facts, in the early days the media printed lies, and misinformation. They are responsible for so many ridiculous myths, and now they cover up the facts like they don't exist, yet we're the trolls........go figure.

      Delete
    2. 01:57, I've been trying to "go figure" as you put it, for the last 8 yrs, along with everyone else!! As you say, only one side of the story is being reported, the parent's side. Who in your opinion is stopping the truth being told? Is it unreasonable for normal thinking people to question all the inconsistencies, in their statements, and a lot more besides? Just who is being protected is anyone's guess, it's certainly someone other than the McCann's that's for sure.

      Delete
    3. The head of UK police, the government are the McCanns are all part of a massive coverup. It is not possible for our police force to be so inept and so stupid as to consider this couple innocent victims. The McCann's story/alibi is shot through with holes and blatant lies that any amateur sleuth could solve. Only psychopaths play tennis and jog when their darling child is missing. Any normal couple would be out there pounding the pavements desperately, and I mean utterly desperately searching for her. Why the police and government are covering up and hindering a real investigation is really a matter of the most horrifying conjecture. This means we cannot trust either authority to do the right thing, and act on behalf of human decency when called upon to do so.

      Delete
  3. Truthful trolls unite. We will never be silenced in telling the masses the truth behind the lies & deception in this sad case. Viva la internet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I laughed after reading this. The cops who work for Scotland Yard can't be thick, they must be embarrassed to the point of going into hiding...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's hard to believe there aren't any decent cops among that lot. So much for Nicola Wall who took over, from Andy Redwood, saying how fast she solved cases!! For crying out loud do the job you are being handsomely paid for, and stop treating the public like mugs that are forced to pay for a sub-standard "Police Force."

      And a message to our Government...Remove the D notices, and Super injunctions, and lets get to the bottom of this, for the sake of Madeleine, and our future generations.

      Delete
    2. The are not thick. They are part of a coverup. The rot starts at the very top of our society and works it way down. We too should be draining our swamp.

      Delete
  5. I believe that the Bell Pottinger PR company was paid to protect the Mark Warner companys valuable, worldwide childcare licence. I believe that Mark Warners nanny was minding Madeleine in apartment 5A when she fell off the top of the sofa (whilst holding cuddle cat, hence the cadarver odour) onto a tiled floor, smashed her head & sadly died. I believe the McCanns were terrified of an autopsy being done (due to long term sedation, etc) & Warners did not know this when they offered the McCanns & Tapas group mega money to say that no Warner nanny was minding Madeleine in 5A when she died. I believe that Madeleine died on Sunday evening & that Bell Pottingers Crisis Management team were employed very early on by Warners to assist with the coverup of their nanny minding Madeleine in apartment 5A on that fateful Sunday evening. Warners had too much to lose by this revelation, their valuable worldwide childcare licence & reputation. The McCanns had too much to lose if an autopsy was done (unknown to Warners) & it became a win, win situation for all concerned when the mega money deal was done. Follow the money trail. I believe that Lord Bell has boasted of his contacts in government & that he was paid to keep the McCanns (& Warners) version of their story in the newspapers. Warners are a client of Bell Pottingers PR company...join the dots. I believe that the # Mark Warner nannies, Catriona, Amy, & Charlotte wrote their police statements under duress with Warners pressuring them to give Warners (& McCanns) version of events only. Later, they & the Tapas group found they were in too deep & would face purgery etc charges if they now told the truth. Pact of silence resulted. I believe that apartment 5J was used for short term storage of Madeleines body in the fridge there from Sunday evening. Gerry's large blue bag being used to take her body to apt.5J. Access to this apartment 5J would have been provided by Warners in conjunction with Pottingers Crisis Management team. I believe that Warners & their CMT phoned Robert Murat to rush to PDL ( using a pre-text ploy to get him there early in the week to eventually have him offer his translating services to the up-comming police investigation ) to keep Warners informed of what the police were learning etc. The reasoning behind my beliefs of what happened to Madeleine are based on research of many years to help get justice for Madeleine & Mr. Amaral. All the above beliefs/theories that I have written are OMO (only my opinions) and are all written "without Predudice". Gerry McCann said at the Levenson enquiry that he was fine with/about people haveing theories on the Madeleine case. ...Regards from W.B. Universe.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The McCanns are protected for the same reason VIP and Establishment paedophiles are never brought to justice. Very simply these elite paedophiles need a supply of children from willing and co-operative parents. The one binding factor is Satanic Ritual Abuse, these Satanic rings need fellow Satanists to offer up their children for rape and ultimate honour for them is to give the child up to be used for sex for one last time and then to be a human sacrafice to Satan. Those parents who do this honour are rewarded, and given establishment protection with Clarence Mitchell giving his services. This may seem odd, the parents were involved in pimping out the daughter and having her sacrificed. However there will be no justice for Madelaine, the perpetrators not being found nor her parents being charged. The media fanfare will keep up distracted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with this concept but not the satanic part. This was just an ordinary everyday paedophilia money based arrangement which went wrong!

      Delete
  7. This is the first time I have seen any of this. I have always thought it wrong how this case was handled. The main concerning thing being the dogs' smelling Maddie when the car had been rented so long after. Someone needs to get to the bottom of this so Maddie can be laid to rest. I very much doubt she is still alive. No matter what happened those parents know more and should not have been allowed to keep the younger ones until properly cleared.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be extraordinary if the cadaver and blood dogs were wrong. In my opinion, they were NOT wrong. Goncalo Amaral, the officer in charge of the investigation at the time, wrote that fluids found in the trunk of the car, which both dogs hit on, indicated the corpse had been refrigerated. In my opinion, this is possibly why Murat was suddenly recalled to Portugal from the UK on the 29th April iirc. In my opinion his job was to remove from the apartment and to hide in one of the properties he had access to the corpse of the child who had died some days before the 3rd. when the coast was clear the poor child's body was permanently removed in the trunk of the Renault. In my opinion, since Murat got his hands dirty doing the bidding of the group, including inserting himself into the investigation as a translator, it was decided that he would make a perfect patsy. Framing the patsy was possibly premeditated. Possibly other members of this group, or of a similar related group engaged in similar activities in the form of an Irish family, came along to fire a warning shot across the mcc's bow by claiming he saw a man who looked like GERRY carrying a child that night. Murat was then dropped as the patsy and duly compensated for his inconvenience. The Irish family and the mcc's are all buddies now, or at least the mcc's have the audacity to use the sighting as if the family had never mentioned Gerry, as the Irish fella no longer insists he saw Gerry that night. All In my humble opinion, of course.

      In my opinion, it's kinda-sorta like what Kool AlexAid up there is talking about but I doubt this particular ring is explicitly satanic. (some are, while some just use the trappings of satanism to 1. Enhance their 'materials' for a particular type of 'fetish' and 2. to discredit the children who would come forward. they all are immediately discredited when they start talking about robes and altars, are they not? do you think none of these appalling people ever thought that?) Most who suspect pedophile ring involvement in this case are only considering the perversion aspect and are forgetting about the massive money-making implicit in the world-wide production and distribution of films and other material of this ilk. More than illegal drugs and guns combined. These appalling people form rings with prominent, respectable 'fronts' dominating at the center who rake in the majority of the profits, while the outer circles are made up of ambitious, thoroughly compromised breeders, most of whom were brought up in this environment so it's not exactly a shock to the system when they're told to hand over their children for abuse and profit or else. Home grown 'product' is more profitable with less overhead than trafficking. It is also much safer with less fear of exposure (unless the 'product' is accidentally damaged beyond repair. see: JonBenet Ramsey) though of course trafficking still goes on out of necessity. hence the many missing children everywhere and the massive amounts of children in the UK who are snatched from families by secret family courts and put into care homes where they are trafficked out by prominent people who have that power (or like Savile they just pop over for an afternoon) or custody given over to the abusive parents. toadys and lackeys, the cleaners and fixers and facilitators make up the outer, protective rings. In my opinion, Savile was just such a one--at first, but he moved up the ladder so to speak getting closer and closer to the center but I doubt he ever made it to the very top, that is, he never got to be the center of his own enterprise. Just a theory.

      To get an idea of how these rings operate, see this comprehensive website:

      https://ritualabuse.us/

      Delete
    2. Lets not forget the hired Private Investigators who ripped the McCann's off. Alpha Investigators Cowley and Edgar never questioned key witnesses involved in a World press conference called by Liar Mitchell regarding the Barcelona lead. A sure sign that they knew the lead was a deliberate false sighting.

      Delete
  8. Does anyone find any connection between Brian Kennedy & the Bell Pottinger PR company &/or Mark Warners? Regards from W.B.Universe.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It appears the maiden name of GM's mother Eileen is Ferry. The McC's had a holiday in Donegal, Ireland in 2007 just before the one in Portugal. (who takes so many holidays?) It is claimed the McC's have family in the area. Are they related to THIS Ferry? I'd like to know. Anyone here with resources to find out? Ferry was 56 in 2011 and it says he was expelled from the Seminary.

    Police investigate Donegal child sex ring as horrors of Ferry case emerge
    CATHAL DERVAN @irishcentral July 20,2011 05:05 AM

    http://www.irishcentral.com/news/police-investigate-donegal-child-sex-ring-as-horrors-of-ferry-case-emerge-125880114-237400861.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am still looking for any connection between Mr. Brian Kennedy (the wallet/financial benefactor) and the Bell Pottinger PR company &/or the Mark Warner company. Was he the financial front for Warners continuing to pay for the deception to protect their company & the McCanns version of events? Any connections/information from online investigators will be greatly appreciated.... thankyou from W.B. Universe.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I just think it didn't happen at all and a scenario used to set off a whole chain of events for various reasons, from Child Protection to privacy laws, to freedom of speech, to a social experiment, to and I cant remember his name for the life of me, electronic iris recognition and electronic tracking to the absolute inability of the main stream media to be able or willing to give two sides of a story. I like the OP it points out the bleeding obvious and as of yet no authority has provided adequate answers

    ReplyDelete
  12. i would like madeline to be found dead or alive so we can all have closure

    ReplyDelete
  13. I really believe the parents accidentally overdosed her. She died they panicked and tried to cover it up. Nothing makes sense, too many lies and deception. It's really sad they didn't just tell the truth. I just don't get if your child is taken who leaves their two other children to run back to the tapas bar!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But according to article the dog found blood so that sounds like a crime that was pre-planned.

      Delete
  14. Great summary, thanks for that! There's so much information out there that getting an overview of the basics can be pretty difficult. This list of facts is very helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The McCann's have dodged and used their money and influence by keeping their guilt hidden away from the public. I have always thought these parents were to blame for Madeleines disappearance and murder?

    I would also do more background checks on David Payne who is Gerry's bet friend, it seems he like Gerry were once on the sex register's list back in 2002.

    After seeing how Kate reacted after Madeleine disappeared Kate decides to play a game of tennis? what sort of mother would do that after going through the likely hood that her daughter had just been abducted?

    Many things in this case do not make any sense and just show's how the McCann's are responsible for their own daughters fate?

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's dangerous to judge people based on how they react to a tragedy or crime. We are all different, and although we think we know how we would react ourselves, we don't know for sure, and we can all do strange and inappropriate things in moments of panic, and cut off our emotional response because it is too overwhelming. Please concentrate on the facts, not on behaviours. There is sufficient hard evidence and I think using judgements about behaviours weakens rather than strengthens the case against one or both parents. It is also worth considering statistical probability - most crimes against the person are perpetrated by those close to the victim rather than by random strangers. Other alleged random abductions have been shown to be nothing of the sort. It would be interesting to do a statistical projection of the likelihood of this being a random abduction based on a statistical analysis of different categories of crimes against children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was just pointing out that both parents have showed a lack of emotions towards their missing daughter - and yes i agree that people can show grief in many different ways, but i disagree with you by saying that observing someone's judgments and behaviors weakens the case of them having guilt?

      Delete
  17. Kate and Gerry McCann have lost their appeal against the Portuguese Supreme Court over the book "The Truth of the Lie" written by the former Police Chief in charge of the investigation - Goncalo Amaral; who claimed Madeline McCann ‘died’ and her ‘abduction’ was a cover-up. The Court also claimed the McCann's were not ‘formally in the clear’.

    For the first time, it is now legal to obtain the Chief's book (and watch the documentary based on the book) in the UK.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxGhlYTNisw&t=1s

    ReplyDelete
  18. In your opinion behaviour doesn't matter. To most of the rest of us it most certainly does matter. Read the truth of the lie and you'll see how much behaviour mattered to a certain policeman.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have said from the start of this "MISSING CHILD"the Mcanns were never grief striken,never upset, never cried, tney were only there to make money,as you reports suggests, they BOTH are involved in the death and alleged abduction of their child, no forced entry was found on the shutter or entry to the apartment so as they say in the movies, it was an inside job, they have never shown any remores or emotion when asked about the events they just keep writing more books to fund there lifestyle, to my mind it's obviouse. they are were involved in the death and disposal of their daughter, and are still making as much money as they can from here name,if this had been an abduction and with all the puplicity involved madaline would have been found, either dead or alive

    ReplyDelete
  20. it was preplanned in my opinion as in Gerrys comments on the airport bus

    ReplyDelete
  21. Elaine duffield from thetford Norfolk......no dog well trained can make miss takes a known fact and many murders solved by doing this too...make them take a lie detector...and better still get mediums involved to find the facts to ask Madeline herself lets see them lie then !!! makes my blood boil may she rest in peace once this is all done !!!! :-( :-/

    ReplyDelete
  22. no dog makes mistakes fact when they are well trained many have solved murder cases...make them take a lie detector...better still get mediums invoked too and find out the missing information from Madeline herself may she rest in peace once they convict the parents and all involved of helping them too poor child :-( :-/

    ReplyDelete
  23. What if neighbour heard body falling, and impact sound, instead of sound of the door ? And crying of course stopped.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If they were working class from a council estate they would have been prosecuted without a shadow of a doubt

    ReplyDelete
  25. First to arrive in Portugal was a former Mirror journalist and long-term government spokesperson called Sheree Dodd. In an unprecedented move, the Government took over news-handling on behalf of the McCanns. Sheree Dodd, a former Daily Mirror journalist and long-serving senior spokeswoman for the Government, was dispatched to Portugal. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office announced that she was being deployed as “press officer responsible to act as media liaison officer for the McCann family”. Sheree Dodd was formerly Director of Communications at the Department for Trade and Industry where she had responsibility for media handling, stakeholder relations, marketing and e-communications. Prior to that post she led the news and media relations operations at the Department for Work and Pensions and the Northern Ireland Office. Before joining government communications she enjoyed an extensive career as a political and industrial correspondent on The Mirror newspaper. Sheree is Managing Director of SC Dodd Comms Ltd, which provides advice and delivers communication solutions to a wide range of public and private sector clients. But Dodd was swiftly replaced by the more senior and bombastic figure of Clarence Mitchell, who took a pro-active role, orchestrating a visit to meet the Pope and a tour which took in Spain, Germany and Morocco.
    SHERRIE DODD Also there's the Mccanns spokesperson who they sacked a few years ago was foreign correspondent for the BBC and covered all the nato bombings in yugoslavia and serbia and then was the first reporter on Jill Dando's murder scene ..(2 cover up the fact it was revenge for the death of popular pretty blonde make up artist friend of Milosevic in nato led bombing of a Serbian TV station) i think the fact that the Jill Dando Sebia connection has been kept under raps pretty well so Blair probably though he's the man for the job.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Very good article . So many unanswered questions. Please keep this up to date .

    ReplyDelete
  27. I know lie detectors are not admissible in court but from what I seed on American factual crimes they are good starting point.
    Jeremy Kyle uses them to accuse people of been unfaithful or stealing a friends cash .
    If I were the McCanns I'd demand a lie detector test at at least take some heat off

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were asked to take lie detector tests but they refused. This only adds further guilt imo. I don't know any parent who would refuse to co-operate fully in order to find their missing daughter. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-494765/Now-Kate-McCann-refuses-lie-detector-test-clear-name.html

      Delete
  28. Take a lie detector if your that positive of your innocent ..

    ReplyDelete
  29. They were asked to take lie detectors and refused. That only reinforces their involvement imo. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-494765/Now-Kate-McCann-refuses-lie-detector-test-clear-name.html

    ReplyDelete
  30. I feel that something very big is being covered up here. I would love to know what they are covering up, i beleive the abduction etc to all be a smokescreen; but what are they desperate, at all costs to stop coming out. we must never stop in our condemnation of this pair, as well as the collusion of some of the highest ranked people in the UK

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anyone with half a brain who has read the Portuguese polices files about the case of Madeleine McCann, your own article or that of the ex-lawyer Tony Martin knows that without a shadow of doubt her parents Kate & Gerry have covered up her (probably) accidental death with a fake abduction claim. Their deception & very strange behaviour could possibly be overlooked if it wasn't supported by the evidence from the cadaver dogs. Human beings lie, dogs do not!. I would like to know why in the face of such overwhelming evidence they have had, & are still getting such strong support from the government who took the unprecedented decision to provide them with a professional spokesperson (& lying toe rag!) Clarence Mitchell to defend them & correct them if they say the wrong thing. Surely there are people in the government who must be very well aware they are guilty just as the vast majority of ordinary people believe they are. Why then do you think the government have given the such preferential treatment & also seem to have instructed the press not to print the truth about them?. Surely, it cannot just be that they are middle-class doctors. I feel sure, along with many other people, that something altogether much bigger is being covered up here.

    ReplyDelete
  32. If, as I believe, some people in the government must be almost certain that the McCanns are guilty of covering up thier daughter's death, it begs another obvious question. Why has so much time & money been spent by detectives searching for Madeleine & her "abductors"?. Wasting the taxpayers money like this amounts to another crime in itself! Given that they are not going to be able to break down the McCann parents story without finding Madeleine's body, (& it has probably been cremated), the next best shot would surely be to try to break the "Pact Of Silence" of their friends the so-called Tapas 7. Bribing one of them to tell the truth about what they know must be a better ploy than the complete waste of money in searching for Madeleine who is almost certainly dead. Even if I am wrong & she is still alive, why have the McCann parents not been charged with child neglect, because that is a 100 per cent certain known fact about which everybody is in agreement?.

    ReplyDelete